<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Splitting CamelCase With Regular Expressions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jason.diamond.name/weblog/2009/08/15/splitting-camelcase-with-regular-expressions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jason.diamond.name/weblog/2009/08/15/splitting-camelcase-with-regular-expressions/</link>
	<description>(a Weblog by Jason Diamond)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 18:06:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Smith</title>
		<link>http://jason.diamond.name/weblog/2009/08/15/splitting-camelcase-with-regular-expressions/comment-page-1/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>James Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jason.diamond.name/weblog/?p=27#comment-289</guid>
		<description>Your thinking about camelCasing and PascalCasing is correct.  If Wikipedia (the mother of non-authoritative sources) contradicts that, then, QED, it&#039;s incorrect.  See Microsoft for official definitions (camelCase/PascalCasing).

Please do not corrupt the world by waffling.  camelCase is camelCase and PascalCase is PascalCase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your thinking about camelCasing and PascalCasing is correct.  If Wikipedia (the mother of non-authoritative sources) contradicts that, then, QED, it&#8217;s incorrect.  See Microsoft for official definitions (camelCase/PascalCasing).</p>
<p>Please do not corrupt the world by waffling.  camelCase is camelCase and PascalCase is PascalCase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
